Traitements spécialisés des personnes ayant des problèmes concomitants de santé mentale et toxicomanie : un modèle intégrant la thérapie dialectique comportementale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article décrit un programme de traitements intégrés pour personnes ayant des troubles comorbides de santé mentale et de toxicomanie. La thérapie dialectique comportementale (TDC) a été développée à l'origine par Linehan (l993a ; 1993b) à l'intention des individus souffrant de troubles de personnalité limite et chroniquement suicidaires. Ses principes ont fourni le cadre pour l'organisation d'un programme de traitements spécialisés dans les domaines suivants : toxicomanie et trouble de personnalité limite, troubles liés aux substances et colère, et troubles liés aux substances et troubles alimentaires. Un aperçu de la TDC et les raisons qui appuient un programme concomitant basé sur cette approche sont discutés. On décrit les protocoles pour trois sous-groupes de patients, en portant une attention particulière aux similitudes et aux différences avec le protocole standard de la TDC. Les éléments principaux du programme sont soulignés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".