MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987539344 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2004.237.01.02

Interpretation of charging phenomena based on reservoir fluid (PVT) data

2004· article· en· W1987539344 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. F. M. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Petroleum engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Molar concentration profiles of reservoir fluids reveal accumulation history and alteration. Slope Factors (SF) define rates of exponential decrease in concentration of light n -alkanes (C 3 - n C 5 ) and liquid pseudo-components (P 10+ ) with increasing carbon number. Most petroleum fluids are substantially characterized by SF(C 3 - n C 5 ) and SF(P 10+ ), the former invariably being the greater. Specific paired values of SF(C 3 - n C 5 ) and SF(P 10+ ) are process-diagnostic. In oils, maturation, gas injection, evaporative fractionation and migration depletion involving loss of gas, are recognizable. SF data are interpreted in the light of PVT analyses representing oils (principally from western Canada) and gas-condensates (from numerous basins), also asphaltene pyrolysis experiments and equation of state calculations. Covariant increase of SF(C 3 - n C 5 ) and SF(P 10+ ) during maturation is demonstrated, but correlation is frequently destroyed by modification of the light ends by the admixture of allochthonous gas, increasing only SF(C 3 - n C 5 ). Secondary gas-enrichment is a requisite process for the generation of gas-condensates by evaporative fractionation. Compositional criteria for the recognition of enrichment are provided for the first time, particularly attainment of a value of SF(C 3 - n C 5 ) exceeding 1.69 (a tentative limit). Available data indicate that the process has occurred in a large proportion of oil accumulations, ranging from 23% of 30 reservoirs in the Jurassic Smackover Formation in Alabama, to 78% of 36 in the northern North Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207