Effect of the chain of magnetosomes embedded in magnetotactic bacteria and their motility on Magnetic Resonance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the influence of the magnetosome's chain, the motility, and the bacterial cell of MC-1 magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) on the Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) contrast. Because of its embedded magnetic nanoparticles, that allow magnetic guidance and imaging contrast generation under MRI, magnetotactic bacteria are being considered for therapeutic drug delivery to tumors. In order to separately investigate the different potential sources of contrast in MRI, we used three samples of MC-1 MTB. The first sample was constituted of magnetic bacteria that successfully synthesize magnetic nanoparticles. MC-1 bacteria that do not synthesize magnetosomes form the second sample while the third sample is constituted from dead MC-1 magnetic bacteria containing magnetic nanoparticle. T(2)-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained for multiple echo times. T(2) was then estimated by fitting the signal intensity data for different echo time values to a monoexponential decay curve. It is found that nanoparticles synthesized by MC-1 MTB are the predominant source of contrast in MRI over motion and the cell body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".