Measurement of glycine in human brain by triple refocusing <sup>1</sup>H‐MRS in vivo at 3.0T
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new (1)H-MRS filtering strategy for selective measurement of glycine (Gly) in human brain in vivo at 3.0T is proposed. Investigation of multiple refocusing following a 90 degrees excitation pulse indicated that triple refocusing is most effective for suppression of the strongly coupled resonances of myo-inositol (mI) at the Gly 3.55-ppm resonance. The echo times of the triple refocusing were optimized, with numerical analysis of the filtering performance, as {TE(1), TE(2), TE(3)} = {67, 62, 69} ms. Compared with the 90 degrees -acquired mI signal the mI suppression ratios of the filter were 170 and 1000, in terms of peak amplitude and area, respectively, between 3.51 and 3.59 ppm. From LCModel analyses, using density-matrix calculated spectra as basis functions, the concentration of Gly in parieto-occipital cortex of healthy adults was estimated to be 0.5 +/- 0.1 mM (mean +/- SD, n = 6), with reference to creatine at 8 mM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".