MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987563671 · doi:10.4000/acrh.2553

L’Image à Byzance. Une nouvelle lecture des textes anciens

2010· article· fr· W1987563671 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Zoubouli

Bibliographic record

VenueL Atelier du CRH · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesByzantine architectureArtRepresentation (politics)ClassicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composition du jury : François Hartog,André Guillou,Ennio Concina,Anca Vasiliu,Léon Pressouyre,(Pré-rapporteurs : Leslie Brubaker, Ennio Concina). Résumé : À Byzance eikon désigne indistinctement toute forme de représentation et son usage, relève de multiples régimes, conceptuels aussi bien que pratiques. Nous partons des premiers discours apologétiques issus de la crise iconoclaste pour chercher en aval, dans la littérature antérieure, la théorie byzantine de l’image, entendant par là un sys...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Atelier du CRHSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207