MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987594570 · doi:10.1109/icelmach.2014.6960519

Multi-resolution analysis based data compression for power transformer protection

2014· article· en· W1987594570 on OpenAlexaff
Adel Aktaibi, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletInrush currentTransformerComputer scienceWavelet packet decompositionWavelet transformDaubechies waveletElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a multi-resolution hybrid technique based data compression for protection of power transformer is presented. This hybrid technique is established by combining the d-q axis transformation with the wavelet packet transform (WPT) to provide the proposed (dqWPT) hybrid protection technique for power transformer. In this technique, signal decomposition and reconstruction are carried out for the collected fault and inrush current signals for different types of mother wavelets at a certain number of levels. The number of levels has to be kept the minimum for optimal use. Minimum description length (MDL) method is used to select the best mother wavelet, and the optimal number of decomposition levels required for the power transformer protection using the proposed technique. For this analysis, the Daubechies db4 is selected at one level of resolution is utilized to implement the proposed technique. The proposed technique has shown good results with the selected mother wavelet for different disturbances at the power transformer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207