Forage proportion and particle length affects the supply of amino acids in lactating dairy cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary factors that alter ruminal fermentability on intake, duodenal flows and intestinal digestibility of individual amino acids (AA) in lactating dairy cows. The experiment was designed as a 4×4 Latin square using 4 ruminally and duodenally cannulated lactating dairy cows. Treatments were arranged in a 2×2 factorial design; 2 forage particle lengths (FPL) of alfalfa silage (short and long) were combined with low (35:65) and high (60:40) forage-to-concentrate ratio (F:C; dry matter basis). Four diets were formulated using 2 cuts of alfalfa silage [short (7.9 mm) and long (19.1mm)], combined with 2 ratios of forage to barley grain concentrate (35:65 and 60:40). Overall, the interactions between dietary F:C and FPL on intake, duodenal flows, and intestinal digestibility of AA were marginal. Intakes of total AA and nonessential AA were not different between low- and high-F:C diets, whereas that of essential AA tended to be less with high-F:C diet as a result of lower intakes of Met, Phe, Arg, and His. The flows of total AA and microbial AA were reduced by 22 and 19%, respectively, with increasing F:C ratio in the diets due to consistently reduced flows of individual AA, whereas AA profiles (% of AA-N) of the duodenal protein were not different. Altering F:C from 35:65 to 60:40 decreased the intestinal digestibility of Ile, Leu, Thr, Val, Ala, Cys, and Ser, and consequently, tended to decrease the digestibility of total AA, essential AA, and nonessential AA. Intakes of total AA, essential AA, and nonessential AA were overall not affected by dietary FPL so FPL did not affect the flows or intestinal digestibility of AA. These results indicate that increasing dietary F:C ratio decreased overall AA supply because flow to the duodenum and intestinal digestibility of AA were decreased. However, increasing FPL had no effect on AA supply. The measured duodenal flows of AA were consistent with the predictions of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for the low-forage diet, and were consistent with the National Research Council model for the high-forage diet. Furthermore, the digestibility of individual AA in the intestine varied considerably, regardless of dietary treatment. The results revealed the necessity to consider the both flows and digestibility of individual AA when optimizing ration formulation to meet AA requirements of dairy cows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".