MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987606494 · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.031918

Annihilation and reflection of spiral waves at a boundary for the Beeler-Reuter model

2008· article· en· W1987606494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiral (railway)AnnihilationReflection (computer programming)Spiral waveBoundary (topology)Domain (mathematical analysis)DiffusionMechanicsPhysicsMaterials scienceMathematical analysisMathematicsComputer scienceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employ a reaction diffusion equation with local dynamics specified by the Beeler-Reuter model to study the meandering of spiral waves. With the appropriate choice for the conductances of sodium and calcium channels, the trajectory of the tip of a spiral wave lies on a straight line. The phenomenon of annihilation or reflection of a spiral at the boundaries of the domain is studied. This phenomenon is analyzed in terms of the variable j , which controls the reactivation of the sodium channel in the Beeler-Reuter model. The results presented can have potential applications in the study of cardiac arrhythmias by providing insight on the interaction between spiral waves and obstacles in the heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it