MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987623929 · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.15.11174

Elongin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2000· article· en· W1987623929 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher M. Koth, Maria Victoria Botuyan, Rodney J. Moreland, David B. Jansma, Joan Conaway, R CONAWAY, Walter Chazin, James D. Friesen, C.H. Arrowsmith, A.M. Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyYeastGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elongin is a transcription elongation factor that was first identified in mammalian systems and is composed of the three subunits, elongin A, B, and C. Sequence homologues of elongin A and elongin C, but not elongin B, were identified in the yeast genome. Neither yeast elongin A nor C sequence homologues was required for cell viability. The two gene products could be purified from yeast as a complex. A recombinant form of the complex, which could only be produced in bacteria if the gene products were co-expressed, was purified over several chromatographic steps. The complex did not stimulate transcription elongation by yeast RNA polymerase II. Using limited proteolysis, the N-terminal 144 residues of yeast elongin A were shown to be sufficient for interaction with yeast elongin C. The purified complex of yeast elongin C/elongin A(1-143) was analyzed using circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic spectroscopy. These studies revealed that yeast elongin A is unfolded but undergoes a dramatic modification of its structure in the presence of elongin C, and that elongin C forms a stable dimer in the absence of elongin A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207