MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987628193 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33319

A homozygous deletion of 8q24.3 including the <i>NIBP</i> gene associated with severe developmental delay, dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, and dysmorphic facial features

2010· article· en· W1987628193 on OpenAlexaff
Arie Koifman, Annette Feigenbaum, Weimin Bi, Lisa G. Shaffer, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Susan Blasér, David Chitayat

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysgenesisGeneticsCorpus callosumGeneBiologyMedicinePsychologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have identified by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis (aCGH), a homozygous deletion of 8q24.3 [arr cgh 8q24.3(140,879,937 --> 141,021,392)x0 mat pat] in a patient with dysmorphic facial features, dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, and severe mental retardation. The deletion was inherited from asymptomatic, consanguineous parents, each of them being heterozygous for the same deletion. The only gene known to map to this segment is the NIBP gene, and so far no clinical manifestations have been found in association with this gene mutation in homozygous or heterozygous state in humans. Our findings suggest that a homozygous deletion in the NIBP gene results in an autosomal recessive condition with multiple abnormalities and severe delay. In addition, the child inherited a 781-kb deletion on 4q32.2 from the mother that contains the SPOCK3 gene. We suggest that this heterozygous deletion is likely to be non-contributory to the phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207