He "coulda been a contender" for Miss America: Feminizing Brando in On the Waterfront
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This alternative reading of On the Waterfront discusses how the film presents a feminized version of Marlon Brando's character, Terry Malloy. Then, it puts this portrayal into context, suggesting that director Elia Kazan wants to portray Terry as American only once this character sheds his womanly trappings and undergoes a rebirth as an "acceptable" bastion of masculinity. After all, in Waterfront 's narrative, which allegorizes Kazan's decision to testify in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee, Terry serves as a surrogate for the director; therefore, Kazan wants to equate Terry's eventual return to masculinity with his own choice to name names. And, in the view of Kazan, "manly men" best represent America. Cette lecture alternative de On the Waterfront (Sur les quais) discute de la façon dont le film présente une version féminisée de Terry Malloy, le personnage joué par Marlon Brando. Elle place alors cette image en contexte, et suggère que le directeur Elia Kazan souhaite offrir Terry en tant qu' Américain seulement lorsque ce personnage se départe de ses accoutrements féminins et accepte de renaître par un passage « acceptable » de la masculinité. Après tout, dans le narratif de Waterfront qui fait de la décision de Kazan une allégorie lorsqu'il témoigne devant le House Un-American Activities Committee , Terry sert de substitut au directeur; Kazan veut donc que le retour éventuel de Terry à la masculinité corresponde à son propre choix de nommer des noms. Et, selon Kazan, « surtout les hommes » représentent le mieux l'Amérique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".