MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987640090 · doi:10.3138/md.46.1.55

Odon von Horvath's <i>Back and Forth: </i>Teetering between Exile and Return

2003· article· en· W1987640090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Malone

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technology and System, Chongqing University
KeywordsEmigrationGermanNazismHistoryPhenomenonGenealogyLiteratureGender studiesArtSociologyPhilosophyEpistemologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the mass emigration of writers and intellectuals from Nazi Germany would at first appear a fairly straightforward historical phenomenon, the perception and reception of German exilic literature have themselves had a spotted and controversial history. The very questions of who was or was not an exile, and whether a particular work should fall under the category of Exilliteratur, have proven to be complicated by a number of factors, and further clouded by differing histories of reception in the fifty years that Germany was divided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicLiterature and Cultural MemoryFrench-language works237,207