L’acculturation à l’écrit dans les pratiques et les instruments des maîtres en situation d’enseignement du français, langue de scolarisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les instruments et les pratiques des enseignants dans le contexte d’enseignement du français langue de scolarisation à destination des élèves nouveaux arrivants non ou peu francophones scolarisés en France du CP au CM2. Le Cours Préparatoire (CP) désigne la première année de l’école primaire, année de l’apprentissage de la lecture, et le Cours Moyen deuxième année (CM2) correspond à la dernière année, celle qui précède l’entrée au collège. La première partie de cet article expose notre problématique et nos cadres théoriques, la seconde fait état de la méthodologie adoptée pour investir la pratique enseignante et la troisième permet de présenter et de commenter les résultats de l’analyse de cette pratique pédagogique qui porte sur un point particulier : l’acculturation à l’écrit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".