MétaCan
← all works

Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review

2003· review· en· 2,377 citations· W1987661380 on OpenAlex· 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.
About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread
0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

The concept-and reality-of continuity of care crosses disciplinary and organisational boundaries. The common definitions provided here should help healthcare providers evaluate continuity more rigorously and improve communication Patients are increasingly seen by an array of providers in a wide variety of organisations and places, raising concerns about fragmentation of care. Policy reports and charters worldwide urge a concerted effort to enhance continuity, 1-3 but efforts to describe the problem or formulate solutions are complicated by the lack of consensus on the definition of continuity. To add to the confusion, other terms such as continuum of care, coordination of care, discharge planning, case management, integration of services, and seamless care are often used synonymously. This synthesis was commissioned by three Canadian health services policy and research bodies. The aim was to develop a common understanding of the concept of continuity as a basis for valid and reliable measurement of practice in different settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
BMJ
Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Field
Health Professions
Canadian institutions
University of CalgaryBritish Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's HealthHôpital Notre-DameUniversité de Montréal
Funders
U.S. Public Health ServiceHealth Resources and Services AdministrationMichael Smith Health Research BCCanadian Health Services Research FoundationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Keywords
Multidisciplinary approachComputer scienceData scienceMedicinePolitical science
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes