MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1987661679 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-40070

Virtual Airway Pressure and Lung Temperature Sensors in a Total Liquid Ventilation Connector

2014· article· en· W1987661679 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Robert, Philippe Micheau, Mathieu Nadeau, Jonathan Vandamme, Julien Mousseau, Olivier Avoine, Michaël Sage, Jean‐Paul Praud, Hervé Walti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirwayOverpressureVentilation (architecture)Pressure sensorCable glandAnesthesiaBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceMedicineEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total liquid ventilation (TLV) is an experimental mechanical ventilation technique where the lungs are completely filled with a perfluorocarbon liquid (PFC). It can be used to implement moderate therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) and treat severe respiratory problems. During TLV, the airway pressure must be monitored adequately to avoid overpressure and airway collapses. On the thermodynamic level, rectal, esophageal or tympanic temperature measurements are not suitable (long time constant) to avoid lowering the heart below 30°C. The objective was to design a Y connector positioned at the mouth which integrates the virtual sensors, used by controllers. The first estimates the airway pressure and the second provides the core body temperature. Pressure and RTD sensors were installed in the connector to implement the virtual measurements. In-vitro experiments were done to validate the virtual sensors. In-vivo experiments (on newborn lambs) confirm the accuracy of the airway pressure estimation and of the systemic arterial temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→