MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Gradient of sodium current across the left ventricular wall of adult rat hearts

2001· article· en· W1987693704 on OpenAlexafffund
Shady M. Ashamalla, Darren Navarro, Christopher A. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsVentricleInternal medicineRepolarizationMyocyteCardiologySodiumSodium channelChemistryElectrophysiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Gradients of ion channels across the left ventricular (LV) wall have been well characterized and it has been shown that disruption of such gradients leads to altered rates of repolarization across the wall, which is associated with the generation of arrhythmias. 2. We have hypothesized that a transmural gradient of I(Na) is present and have directly measured this current in adult rat myocytes isolated from both the epicardial and endocardial layers of the left ventricle. Currents were also recorded in right ventricular (RV) myocytes for comparison. 3. Peak inward I(Na) currents, at -30 mV, were -49.7 +/- 2.5 pA pF(-1) (n = 22), -32.9 +/- 3.2 pA pF(-1) (n = 16) and -49.7 +/- 3.7 pA pF(-1) (n = 24) for RV, LV epicardial and LV endocardial myocytes, respectively. No differences in the voltage dependence of inactivation, the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation, or reactivation were reported. 4. Our results demonstrate that a gradient of sodium current density is present across the LV wall of adult rat hearts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→