MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987704758 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2011.6186215

Modeling of CdZnTe/CdTe/Si triple junction solar cells

2011· article· en· W1987704758 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanzhang Xiao, Z. Q. Li, Michel Lestrade, Z. M. Simon Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsCrosslight Software (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadmium telluride photovoltaicsTriple junctionOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceSilicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using Crosslight APSYS, we have made two-dimensional simulation of triple junction solar cells based on the CdZnTe/CdTe/Si material system with tunnel junctions. The basic physical quantities like band diagram, optical absorption and generation for the modeled TJ cell, and external quantum efficiency for individual sub cell junctions are obtained. Current matching analyses and multi-sun concentration simulation are performed and the presented results indicate cell efficiency 34.92% (one sun) and maximum 39.09% (around 500-700 sun). The results indicates that II-VI CdZnTe and CdTe based materials can be used to develop multi-junction solar cell on silicon substrate with cell efficiency comparable to those III-V based compound on Ge substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207