MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987752358 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0763

Space‐vector slope‐based method for fast locating of switched capacitors in power systems

2013· article· en· W1987752358 on OpenAlexaff
Atieh Saadatpoor, Ahmadreza Tabesh, Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorSwitched capacitorElectric power systemComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringEngineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a fast locating algorithm for a switched shunt capacitor based on the slopes of the voltage/current space vectors at monitoring points of a power system. Compared with the other suggested slope‐based methods, such as signal‐processing and filter‐based methods, the proposed algorithm herein offers a robuster and more reliable locating method because of using the information of all three phases, whereas other methods separately process individual phase signals. The method is training free and established based on algebraic calculations with a simple realisation algorithm, which is independent of the power system dynamics and parameters. The proposed method is analytically investigated and then verified based on the time‐domain simulation of two study systems. The study systems cover various capacitor‐switching scenarios, harmonic effects and measurement noise and power system dynamics including dynamics of rotating machines and power electronic converters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207