Resonant scattering and second-harmonic spectroscopy of planar photonic crystal microcavities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The resonant modes of two-dimensional planar photonic crystal microcavities patterned in a free-standing InP slab are probed in a novel fashion using a long working distance microscope objective to obtain cross-polarized resonant scattering and second-harmonic spectra. We show that these techniques can be used to do rapid effective assays of large arrays of microcavities that do not necessarily contain resonant light-emitting layers. The techniques are demonstrated using microcavities comprised of single missing-hole defects in hexagonal photonic crystal hosts formed with elliptically shaped holes. These cavities typically support two orthogonally polarized resonant modes, and the resonant scattering and harmonic spectra are well fitted using a coherent sum of Lorentzian functions. The well-defined coherence between the two resonant features is explained in terms of a microscopic harmonic oscillator model. The relative merits of these techniques are quantitatively compared with the more commonly used cavity-enhanced photoluminescence technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".