Alveolar Gas Pressure Changes with Resistive Loads in Man
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respiratory responses to a single breath during which a resistive load was applied were studied in 8 conscious subjects. There was an increase in inspiratory time (T<sub>1</sub>), an increase in end-tidal Pco<sub>2</sub> (P<sub>ET</sub>co<sub>2</sub>) and a decrease in end-tidal Po<sub>2</sub> (PetO<sub>2</sub>) on the resisted breath. 12 subjects were given a single inspiration of a mixture of air containing increased CO<sub>2</sub> and reduced O<sub>2</sub>. This gas mixture induced changes in P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>ET</sub>O<sub>2</sub> approximately double those seen with the resistive loads. There was no change in tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>), T<sub>1</sub> or expiratory time during the first breath. During the following breath there was a small increase in T<sub>1</sub> and V<sub>T</sub>· The results indicate that although resistive loading may cause changes in PetCCCO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>ET</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, these changes are unlikely to contribute to the respiratory responses during the first loaded breath.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".