MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987764009 · doi:10.3156/jsoft.20.108

Computer aided diagnosis for pulmonary nodules by extracting new shape features from X-ray CT images

2008· article· en· W1987764009 on OpenAlexaff
Kazunori Takei, Noriyasu Homma, Tadashi Ishibashi, Masao Sakai, Takakuni Goto, Makoto Yoshizawa, Kenichi Abe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-rayComputer scienceRadiologyComputer-aided diagnosisMedicineNuclear medicineArtificial intelligencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本論文では,胸部 X線 CT画像から高い真陽性率で肺結節を検出可能であると同時に,低い偽陽性率を達成するような,信頼性の高い計算機支援診断手法を提案する.提案手法は,効果的に対象画像の特徴を表現する新たな二つの特徴量を抽出することで,目的とする鑑別性能の向上を試みたものである.一つ目の新特徴量は,陰影の形状的特徴を表す指標であり,もう一つは陰影形状の体軸方向の連続性に関する特徴量である.実験の結果,従来手法に比べて提案手法の鑑別率が優れており,その有効性が示された.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent InformaticsSame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207