MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987787853 · doi:10.1080/00908310390195615

Integrated Fuzzy-Stochastic Modeling of Petroleum Contamination in Subsurface

2003· article· en· W1987787853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleumMonte Carlo methodPetroleum engineeringContaminationPermeability (electromagnetism)Fuzzy logicGroundwaterPorosityFuzzy setEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceMathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integrated approach associated with fuzzy set theory, Monte Carlo simulation, and interval analysis are proposed in this study to address the uncertainties in simulating petroleum contamination in the subsurface. A numerical multiphase compositional modeling technique is implemented to examine the fate of petroleum contaminants in groundwater. The intrinsic permeability, longitudinal dispersivity, and soil porosity are considered as uncertain input parameters. A three-dimensional (3D) case of a petroleum contamination problem is presented to illustrate the suitability and capability of the proposed methods for managing uncertainties. The results show that the uncertainties in intrinsic permeability and porosity will have significant impacts on the modeling outputs. Neglecting these uncertainties may result in an unreasonable estimation of the contaminant fate in the subsurface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it