MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987809008 · doi:10.1258/1357633001935671

A laboratory for testing the interoperability of telehealth systems

2000· article· en· W1987809008 on OpenAlex
Laura Sutherland, Eugene Igras, Robert R. Ulmer, Peter Sargious

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityTelehealthTeleradiologyIntegrated Services Digital NetworkTelemedicineTelecommunicationsPhoneComputer scienceHealth careMultimediaWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interoperability allows telehealth equipment to interact to achieve predictable results. To address the need for telehealth interoperability, the Alberta Research Council has been working with the Alberta Health and Wellness organization in Canada, and others, to create guidelines and a facility for testing telehealth equipment for compliance with technical interoperability standards. The laboratory consists of two rooms (7 m x 7 m) in a new building. The rooms are wired with easy-to-configure copper and fibre networks for telephone, Switch-56, ISDN, ATM, wireless and satellite services. One room specializes in teleconsultation and tele-education, while the other has facilities for teleradiology and telemonitoring. The rooms are interconnected in order to perform interoperability tests between realtime and store-and-forward equipment. The laboratory was piloted in the summer of 1999.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it