MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987821430 · doi:10.1103/physreve.72.031805

Nonequilibrium theory of polymer stretching based on the master equation

2005· article· en· W1987821430 on OpenAlexafffund
Felix Hanke, H. J. Kreuzer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKillam Trusts
KeywordsMaster equationGranularityStatistical physicsHysteresisNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsRelaxation (psychology)Extension (predicate logic)PolymerPhysicsThermodynamicsMathematicsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a model for fast polymer-stretching experiments. We use the master equation and argue that the end-to-end extension of a polymer molecule can be used as a stochastic variable after appropriate coarse graining. The main effect of increasing pulling speed or force loading rate is a marked hysteresis in the force-extension curve as well as an overall shift of the curve to higher forces when compared to the equilibrium curve. This can be understood in terms of the moments of the transition probability in the master equation. An analysis of the fluctuations and relaxation times is also given in the framework of our theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207