« Rien de nouveau sous les soleils ». Répétition et origine de l’histoire dans L’Éternité par les astres de Blanqui.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Éternité par les astres de Louis-Auguste Blanqui est révélatrice de la posture critique et ironique des écrivains modernes face aux philosophies de l’histoire du XIXe siècle. Le projet est à forte connotation politique, puisque Blanqui cherche à symboliser l’horizon des événements historiques sans réduire le déploiement du devenir à une Origine ou à une Finalité. L’aporie surgissant dans le texte ne peut toutefois que ramener la question de l’origine à l’avant-scène, puisque sa propre pragmatique doit nécessairement désigner le lieu et le moment de son avènement : comment s’engager dans la description du plan d’où procède toute historicité sans y laisser la marque de sa propre inscription historique ? Comment, sinon par la répétition, refuser à sa propre prise de parole une origine ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".