Simultaneous Production of Disk and Lobes: A Single‐Wind MHD Model for the η Carinae Nebula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The luminous blue variable η Carinae is surrounded by a complex and highly structured nebula of ejected material. The best-studied and axisymmetric components of this outflow consist of bipolar lobes (the "homunculus") and an equatorial "skirt." Recent proper-motion measurements suggest that the skirt was ejected at the same time as the lobes, contrary to the assumptions of all current theoretical models for the formation of the nebula (which use the skirt to collimate stellar winds into lobes). We present a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stellar wind model that produces an outflowing disk and bipolar lobes in a single, steady state wind. The basic model consists of a wind from a rotating star with a rotation axis-aligned dipole magnetic field. The azimuthal component of the magnetic field, generated by stellar rotation, compresses the wind toward the equator and also toward the rotation axis, simultaneously producing an outflowing disk and jet. We use numerical MHD simulations to study the wind for various amounts of stellar rotation and to show a range of wind morphologies. In order to produce wide-angle lobes similar to the homunculus (which have roughly a 30° opening angle), a high-speed polar wind (with enhanced energy density) from the star is also required. In that case, the structure of the wind bears a remarkable resemblance to the skirt plus homunculus morphology of the η Car nebulae, and a significant fraction of the stellar angular momentum is carried away by the wind. Although the model assumes a steady state wind (rather than an eruption) and thermal wind driving (rather than radiation pressure), the structure of the wind is encouraging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".