Study on Temperature Uniformity and Rising Rate of High-Power Lithium-Ion Battery Pack
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the operating characteristics of high-power battery pack in practical application, the effects of four factors, which include operating load, state of charge (SOC), ambient temperature and operating temperature, on the temperature uniformity and rising rate of battery pack under natural convection were studied based on Arbin test bench. The results indicate that: the operating load and SOC of battery pack doesn’t affect its temperature uniformity, which was deteriorated as the increasing of operating temperature of battery pack, or improved as the increasing of ambient temperature when the other factor is kept constant. The increment of operating load or ambient temperature could result in a higher temperature rising rate, while the increasing of SOC or operating temperature could lead to a lower temperature rising rate, when the other three factors are kept constant. When the operating temperature or temperature differences achieved threshold value, thermal management system should choose proper extent of forced flow and flow field in accordance with the battery pack’s current operating conditions, in order to ensure the economy of the thermal management system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it