MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987917036 · doi:10.7202/1020839ar

Le rapport entre le juridique et le clinique dans l’application de la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse : une perspective relationnelle

2013· article· fr· W1987917036 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Laurence Ricard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La protection de la jeunesse est une sous-discipline du droit de la famille qui est peu étudiée par les milieux universitaires du monde juridique. Cependant, une analyse des objectifs de la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse du Québec montre que les fondements cliniques de la Loi se heurtent souvent au fonctionnement rigide du milieu juridique. Par le biais d’une perspective relationnelle qui explique la nouvelle orientation prise par la Loi depuis les modifications de 2006, l’auteure cherche à montrer que plusieurs caractéristiques du système contradictoire ne sont pas cohérentes avec la nouvelle conception de l’enfant et de l’individu véhiculée par la Loi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.033
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207