Bibliographic record
Abstract
Androgens are responsible for maintaining epididymal structure and functions. However, little is known about how androgen action is mediated and the mechanisms underlying the restoration of the integrity of epididymal cells after androgen deprivation. We first provide an overview of what is known about androgen action in this tissue and then present data on the initial and sequential roles of androgens in altering cellular architecture and function in an androgen-deprived condition. Using morphometric analysis and the rat model, we identified changes in epithelial cell height and lumen diameter, as well as in the numbers of proliferating cells in different regions and at various time points after androgen withdrawal and replacement. The sequence of gene activation or suppression that occurred in the androgen-deprived tissue was examined upon the readministration of the 2 active metabolites of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and estradiol. Although few genes were regulated by estradiol, many were affected by DHT. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF1) appear to play an important role in the early response pathway activated by DHT because of their function in the regulation of the expression of many other genes. The intracellular signaling pathway involved in mediating the action of androgen in restoring epididymal epithelial cell integrity was investigated using the PC-1 epididymal cell line. IGF1 and EGF receptors were found to be important mediators of androgen receptor-mediated activation of the MAPK/ERK pathways. Together, these studies provide a greater understanding of the mechanisms of androgen action in the epididymis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".