Long-range detection and length estimation of light filaments using extra-attenuation of terawatt femtosecond laser pulses propagating in air
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-energy femtosecond laser pulses propagating in the atmosphere undergo self-focusing resulting in the appearance of the phenomenon of filamentation. We observed an extra-attenuation of such (terawatt) femtosecond laser pulses propagating in the atmosphere when compared with long pulses (200 ps) with the same energy. This is because, in contrast to the linear propagation of the long pulse, the input femtosecond laser pulse is attenuated owing to either absorption through multiphoton ionization/tunnel ionization or to scattering on the laser-induced plasma; self-phase-modulation and self-steepening further convert partially the energy initially contained in the fundamental bandwidth into the broad side bands of the laser, becoming eventually a white-light laser pulse (supercontinuum). The experimental data allow us to extract an effective extra-attenuation coefficient for an exponential decay of the input pulse energy with the propagation distance. Such a coefficient allows us to estimate an upper bound of the filament length under the experimental conditions used. More generally, our observation leads to a new technique to remotely detect light filaments in the atmosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".