MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987964887 · doi:10.1109/iccit.2008.413

Wireless Sensor Based Field Hockey Strategy System

2008· article· en· W1987964887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Shamala, R. Tareq, Roger Canda, Ali Maher, A. Yahya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceCricketField hockeyWirelessTracking systemNode (physics)Field (mathematics)Real-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer networkArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of a wireless sensor network which is deployed for the purpose of analyzing the strategy for field hockey. The Indoor Cricket Location System has been used to acquire the location of a particular sensor node known as the listener. A review of the existing strategic systems utilized by the national coach of the Malaysian women's hockey team is provided to complement the design and motivation of this project. The review and analysis was done during the participation of the Malaysian women's hockey team at the Olympic Qualifier in Victoria, Canada. The visualization of the application for the purpose of analyzing the wide-spectrum of probabilities in player movement has been done using OpenGL. As an initial stage of the experiment using the Cricket Indoor Location System was used to acquire the pre-defined coordinate system. The obtained results have enabled a dynamic strategic planning to facilitate the strategy planning which captures the essence of the human tracking and cohesively harnesses the reconfiguration elements of Wireless Sensor Networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207