Canadá y el gobierno de los océanos: el espacio marítimo en un Estado descentralizado .
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde la aprobacion de la Ley de los Oceanos (1996), Canada ha sido considerado una referencia internacional en el proceso de construccion de un nuevo paradigma oceanico basado en una vision integrada y omnicompresiva del mar. Su estudio permite contrastar en que medida la descentralizacion politico-territorial se extiende al gobierno de lo maritimo. La aproximacion a las problematicas vinculadas a la gestion federal y provincial de las areas marinas y a las modalidades con que se estan elaborando modelos viables de planificacion, puede constituir un aporte valioso para otras iniciativas nacionales. Se sostiene la hipotesis que en un Estado descentralizado, en el cual cabria esperar que la descentralizacion se extendiese a las cuestiones marinas, se constata cierta reticencia a devolver a las varias unidades politico-territoriales los poderes de administracion del area oceanica. Esta se constituiria asi en el ultimo baluarte de la fortaleza soberana de la autoridad nacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".