Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response in Juvenile Rats Fed Rat Milk Formulas with High Docosahexaenoic Acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Previous studies found that juvenile offspring of rats fed high docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3) diets through gestation and lactation had longer auditory brainstem-evoked response (ABR) accompanied by higher 22:6n-3 and lower arachidonic acid (ARA; 20:4n-6) in brain. In the present study, ABR was assessed in juvenile rats fed high-DHA diets only postnatally. METHODS: Rat pups were fed rat milk formulas with varying amounts of DHA and ARA to 19 days of age followed by diets with the corresponding fatty acids. The high-DHA group was fed 2.3% of fatty acids as DHA, the DHA + ARA group was fed DHA and ARA at 0.6 and 0.4% of fatty acids, levels similar to those in some infant formulas, and the unsupplemented group was fed no DHA or ARA. ABR and fatty acid and monoamine levels in brain were measured on postnatal days 26-28. Statistical analyses were measured by ANOVA. RESULTS: ARA and DHA levels in brain increased with supplementation. ABR was shorter in the high-DHA group than the DHA + ARA group and not different from the unsupplemented or dam-reared suckling group. Norepinephrine levels in the inferior colliculus were lower in the high-DHA group than the DHA + ARA group and higher in all formula groups compared to the dam-reared group. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the longer ABR in juvenile offspring of rats fed high-DHA through gestation and lactation, ABR was shorter in juvenile rats fed high-DHA diets only after birth than rats fed ARA + DHA. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between dietary DHA, norepinephrine, and auditory system development over a range of DHA intakes and discrete periods of development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".