MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988008840 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2211316

Broadband Multiple Cone-Beam 3-D IIR Digital Filters Applied to Planar Dense Aperture Arrays

2012· article· en· W1988008840 on OpenAlexaff
Chamith Wijenayake, Arjuna Madanayake, L.T. Bruton

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responsePassbandBroadbandComputer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsMathematicsPhysicsDigital filterBand-pass filterOpticsBandwidth (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A digital beamformer that can synthesize array factors (AFs) with multiple, ultrawideband (UWB), frequency-independent beams at lower computational complexity is proposed. The beamformer is based on a novel 3-D infinite impulse response (IIR) transfer function$H_{\rm MC}\left({\bf z}\right)$having multiple cone-shaped passbands in the 3-D spatio–temporal (ST) frequency-domain$\mmb{\omega}\in\BBR^{3}$. The magnitude frequency response and the AF of$H_{\rm MC}\left({\bf z}\right)$are simulated for dual- and single-passband cases. An element pattern of a broadband Vivaldi antenna is simulated at 1.4 GHz and is used to obtain the total array pattern. Computational complexity of$H_{\rm MC}\left({\bf z}\right)$for single-passband (1Cone) case and that of the conventional phased array (PA) beamformer are derived. The magnitude frequency response of the proposed beamformer for 1Cone case and that of the PA beamformer are compared using the mean square error (MSE). For the given selectivity specified by the half cone angle$\epsilon={\hbox {5}}^{\circ}$, proposed beamformer provides around 60% lower MSE for the same complexity and around 90% lower complexity for the same MSE compared with the PA beamformer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207