Circuits, Networks, and HIV Risk Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drawing on a survey of men who have sex with men conducted at Toronto's largest gay and lesbian event (N = 947), this study examines the characteristics of men who report that they like to participate in the "bareback scene" and cruise "bareback Web sites" by comparing them with men who (a) report having had at least one incident of unprotected anal intercourse but no bareback connections, or (b) report consistently protected anal intercourse (UAI). Overall, 62.0% of the surveyed men reported having had a casual male partner in the last 6 months, 14.2% of whom reported having had UAI. Including these men, with men who report UAI with or without ejaculation, with casual or regular partners, accounts for 40.6% of the sample. MSM in bareback scenes or Web sites form a circuit insofar as they are significantly overrepresented in a set of bars, baths, parks, and Web sites, that aligns closely with one of the circuits identified in a factor analysis of venues attended by men in the sample. They also show a distinctive pattern of beliefs and perceptions of appropriate norms for sexual conduct, and are more likely to have had five or more partners in the last 6 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it