MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988035673 · doi:10.15695/hmltc.v34i2.3369

David Schnasa Jacobsen and Robert Allen Kelly, Kairos Preaching: Speaking Gospel to the Situation

2009· article· en· W1988035673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Stern

Bibliographic record

VenueHomiletic · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKairosGospelTheologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title is entirely too modest.Far more than a bag of tricks or even a rite-by-rite list of tactics and techniques for preaching at various situations, a.k.a."special occasions," it is, as the authors themselves suggest, a kairos theology which has serious and lasting implications for preaching.In their words, "Our goal here is to help you to understand the gospel that you preach theologically."Maybe more than helping us to understand the theology we preach, they propose and work from their own theology.This does not mean they do not allow readers room for different points of view, but this is not a theology-neutral book.The authors want preachers to be thoughtful theologians, not people who merely crank out an endless stream of shallow reflections for popular consumption.It is not until the Appendix, however, that the authors begin to look at the actual construction of the sermon or homily.The opening two chapters introduce the reader to the undergirding theology that will inform the rest of the book; first their understanding of the gospel and then, in chapter 2, their understanding of context ("enduring social, cultural, and political features") and situation ("a moment of crisis that evokes a sense of limit/finitude or calls forth a decision").It is a throughgoing, unabashed "Lutheran" (both teach at a Lutheran seminary, although one is not Lutheran) approach with occasional references to non-Lutheran but relevant and resonant sources.The gospel, they insist, is not a "problem/solution plotline" but a "promise from God that always invites us into a faithful hope that requires theological reflection."Critical theological presuppositions include first, that "the doctrine of justification offer a word of radical grace in any context and situation;" second, that the word of the gospel is extra nos or "outside of us;" third, that "justification by grace through faith is a matter of divine promise and always has an eschatological shape;" and finally that the doctrine is not just pro me ("for me") but pro nobis ("for us") and pro aliis ("for others").As an aside, the frequent use of Latin theological phrases does little to help make the authors' case, although it might accrue greater pedagogical merit in, for example, a systematic theology class.The remaining chapters examine several situations for preaching and follow a similar structure with a theological discussion, followed by one or more "commonplaces" or topoi that one might employ, which are further delineated with implications of each commonplace.Chapter 3, on preaching at funerals, will be pretty familiar stuff for most seasoned pastors/preachers but a fine and deeply thoughtful introduction for seminarians.The rest of the chapters are far more provocative and would be excellent reading for those desiring a deeper, more global, considered theological approach to preaching for weddings, stewardship, injustice, and public crises, with a chapter on each.The chapter on weddings, for example, discusses social and cultural issues around concepts of marriage.They enter the risky realms of same-sex marriages, which are legal in Canada where they teach, and the common but unexamined concepts of marriage that have been shaped by the consumerism that pervades our culture.The final chapter is more open-ended.Here the authors really push the preacher to not settle for the thin veneer or overused clichés that one often hears on these occasions.There is a distinct prophetic slant to their discussion.I can imagine the book being essential reading for a seminary class learning about preaching at the several occasions addressed in the book.It would also be a beneficial read even for veteran preachers who may have inadvertently settled for a thin veneer of trite theology manifested in ferverinos and moralisms, which fail to equip assemblies to move forward in their

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHomileticSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207