MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988051973 · doi:10.1109/ised.2012.15

Improvements for High Performance Elliptic Curve Cryptosystem Processor over GF(2^163)

2012· article· en· W1988051973 on OpenAlexaff
K.C. Cinnati Loi, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
KeywordsComputer scienceElliptic curve cryptographyParallel computingFinite fieldGF(2)Field-programmable gate arrayElliptic curveAffine transformationCryptosystemMultiplier (economics)Matrix multiplicationElliptic curve point multiplicationArithmeticComputer hardwareAlgorithmEncryptionMathematicsCryptographyPublic-key cryptographyOperating systemDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improvements of the Elliptic Curve Cryptosystem (ECC) point multiplication processor is presented in this paper. The main contributions of this paper are the improved finite field multiplier, which uses a 2-stage Karatsuba-Ofman multiplier architecture. Furthermore, a revised algorithm is proposed for the projective to affine coordinate conversion, which computes 2 inversion operations simultaneously with the numerator portion, in order to make better use of parallel cores implemented in the ECC processor. The design is implemented on a Virtex 4 XC4VLX80 FPGA and the implementation results show that the ECC processor can compute a point multiplication in 6.72 us. This time is the fastest to the authors' best knowledge. Thus, the ECC processor proposed in this paper is suitable for applications where high-throughput is required, such as network servers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207