Multiple-Quantum Relaxation Dispersion NMR Spectroscopy Probing Millisecond Time-Scale Dynamics in Proteins: Theory and Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New relaxation dispersion experiments are presented that probe millisecond time-scale dynamical processes in proteins. The experiments measure the relaxation of (1)H-(15)N multiple-quantum coherence as a function of the rate of application of either (1)H or (15)N refocusing pulses during a constant time relaxation interval. In contrast to the dispersion profiles generated from more conventional (15)N((1)H) single-quantum relaxation experiments that depend on changes in (15)N((1)H) chemical shifts between exchanging states, (1)H-(15)N multiple-quantum dispersions are sensitive to changes in the chemical environments of both (1)H and (15)N spins. The resulting multiple-quantum relaxation dispersion profiles can, therefore, be quite different from those generated by single-quantum experiments, so that an analysis of both single- and multiple-quantum profiles together provides a powerful approach for obtaining robust measures of exchange parameters. This is particularly the case in applications to protonated proteins where other methods for studying exchange involving amide proton spins are negatively influenced by contributions from neighboring protons. The methodology is demonstrated on protonated and perdeuterated samples of a G48M mutant of the Fyn SH3 domain that exchanges between folded and unfolded states in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it