MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988080311 · doi:10.1139/v05-233

Ab initio study of the decomposition of formamidine

2005· article· en· W1988080311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsChemistryDecompositionTransition stateMoleculeAb initioActivation barrierReaction coordinateActivation energyChemical decompositionTransition state theoryPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryAmmoniaStandard enthalpy of formationAb initio quantum chemistry methodsHydrogenYield (engineering)ThermodynamicsReaction rate constantDensity functional theoryKineticsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decomposition of formamidine yielding hydrogen cyanide and ammonia has been investigated by ab initio calculations. Optimized geometries for reactants, transition states, and products were determined at the HF/6-31G(d) and MP2/6-31G(d) levels of theory. Energies were also determined at the G1, G2, G2MP2, G3, G3B3, G3MP2, and G3MP2B3 levels of theory. The role of water in the decomposition reaction of formamidine was examined. Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) analysis was carried out for all transition states. Activation energies, enthalpies and free energies of activation were also calculated for each reaction pathway. G3 level of theory predicts the gas-phase decomposition of formamidine to have a high activation energy of 259.1 kJ mol –1 . Adding one water molecule catalyses the reaction by forming a cyclic hydrogen-bonded transition state, reducing the barrier to 169.4 kJ mol –1 at the G3 level. Addition of a second water, which acts as a "solvent" molecule, further reduces the barrier to 151.1 kJ mol –1 at the G3 level. These values are still high and explain why rather extreme conditions are necessary to achieve this reaction experimentally. Thermodynamic properties (ΔE, ΔH, and ΔG) for each reaction pathway studied were also calculated. The G3 heats of reaction (ΔE) of the gas-phase decomposition of formamidine, its complex with one water molecule, and its complex with two water molecules are 0.9, 2.2, and –5.1 kJ mol –1 , respectively. The G3 heat of reaction for the gas-phase decomposition to yield separated products is 22.3 kJ mol –1 . Free energies of reaction and of activation in aqueous solution were calculated with PCM using the KLAMT cavity model. At MP2 the formamidine reaction is found to be exergonic in aqueous solution and to favour formation of the separated products (NH 3 + HCN). The solvent model predicts a significant lowering of the free energy of activation (16–18 kJ mol –1 ) for the unimolecular reaction and 21–42 kJ mol –1 for the water-mediated reaction in aqueous solution relative to the gas phase. Key words: decomposition reaction, formamidine, Hartree–Fock, post Hartree–Fock, Gaussian-n theories, IRC, solvation models, PCM, KLAMT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it