MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Limited Feedback-Based Multi-Antenna Relay Broadcast Channels with Block Diagonalization

2013· article· en· W1988115167 on OpenAlexaff
Le Liang, Wei Xu, Xiaodai Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingComputer scienceRelayChannel state informationTelecommunications linkCodebookTransmitterComputer networkMultiplexingFadingMIMOChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsWirelessPower (physics)AlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relay technology is effective in extending radio coverage and improving the performance of cell edge users. In multi-antenna relay channels, good knowledge of the channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter is important to achieve multiplexing gains of the multiple-input multiple-output technique. In this paper, we study the multi-antenna relay downlink channel with limited feedback CSI from both two-hop links. Data streams from the base station (BS) are first transmitted to a relay station (RS) with singular value decomposition-based precoding and receiver pulse shaping at the BS and RS, respectively. The block diagonalization precoding is then applied at the RS to forward the received signals to the remote multi-antenna users. We derive an upper bound for the system throughput loss due to CSI quantization error, and then propose a feedback quality control strategy to maintain a bounded rate loss relative to the perfect CSI case. It reveals that the feedback size B_1 from the RS to BS needs to scale in proportion to both transmit power at the BS and RS while the feedback size B_2 from each user to the RS only needs to scale linearly with the transmit power at the RS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207