MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988124933 · doi:10.1080/08916150590953388

Investigation of Error Sources in Temperature Measurement Using Thermocouples in Water Impingement Cooling

2005· article· en· W1988124933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Heat Transfer · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermocoupleMaterials scienceTemperature measurementThermal conductionDistortion (music)MechanicsJet (fluid)Finite element methodWater coolingHeat transferComposite materialThermodynamicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reliability of thermocouples with separation measuring junction in temperature measurement in the cooling process of hot steel plates with impingement jet has been investigated using direct and inverse finite element analysis (FEA). It is concluded that while the attachment of thermocouple wires on surface has negligible influence on surface temperature distribution during air cooling, the conduction of wires in a jet impingement water cooling process has significant effect on the measured temperature. The disturbance of the temperature field due to the introduction of a small hole for the installation of internal thermocouple has also been studied and showed similar but less pronounced effects to those of the surface measurement. An increased distortion of the temperature field is evident when the thermocouple is attached on the top surface directly above the bottom surface of hole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it