MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988142625 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2012.2209446

A Modified Doherty Configuration for Broadband Amplification Using Symmetrical Devices

2012· article· en· W1988142625 on OpenAlexaff
David Yu-Ting Wu, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoherty amplifierAmplifierPredistortionBroadbandElectrical engineeringAdjacent channelLinear amplifierImpedance matchingElectronic engineeringEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Electrical impedanceRF power amplifierTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new Doherty amplifier configuration with an intrinsically broadband characteristic is presented based on the synthesis of key ideas derived from the analyses of the load modulation concept and the conventional Doherty amplifier. Important building blocks to implement the proposed Doherty amplifier structure are outlined, which include the quasi-lumped quarter-wave transmission line, as well as the Klopfenstein taper for broadband impedance matching. A 90-W GaN broadband Doherty amplifier was designed and fabricated and achieved an average peak output power of 49.9 dBm, an average gain of 15.3 dB, and average peak and 6-dB back-off efficiencies of 67.3% and 60.6%, respectively, from 700 to 1000 MHz (35.3% bandwidth). The amplifier is shown to be highly linearizable when driven with 20-MHz WCDMA and long-term evolution signals, achieving adjacent channel power ratio of better than -48 dBc after digital predistortion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207