Mercury Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future Directions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTMercury Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future DirectionsParisa A. Ariya*†‡, Marc Amyot§, Ashu Dastoor∥, Daniel Deeds‡, Aryeh Feinberg†, Gregor Kos‡, Alexandre Poulain⊥, Andrei Ryjkov∥, Kirill Semeniuk∥, M. Subir#, and Kenjiro Toyota¶View Author Information‡ †Department of Chemistry and ‡Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2K6§ Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, 90 avenue Vincent-d'Indy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3C 3J7∥ Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, 2121 TransCanada Highway, Dorval, Quebec, Canada, H9P 1J3⊥ Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5# Department of Chemistry, Ball State University, 2000 West University Avenue, Muncie, Indiana 47306, United States¶ Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3H 5T4*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10, 3760–3802Publication Date (Web):April 30, 2015Publication History Received24 November 2014Published online30 April 2015Published inissue 27 May 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr500667ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr500667ereview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views5823Altmetric-Citations298LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Deposition,Environmental modeling,Mercury,Oxidation,Redox reactions Get e-Alerts
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it