Liposomal Daunorubicin (Daunoxome) in Combination with Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine and Prednisolone (COP-X) as Salvage Therapy in Poor-Prognosis Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We treated 33 patients with a variant of the standard 3 weekly CHOP regime, replacing doxorubicin with liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals) 120 mg/m2 (COP-X). Eighteen subjects had relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL and 15 had indolent NHL/CLL. Median number of courses received was 4 (1-8). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for efficacy and 26 (81%) responded. 88% of patients with aggressive NHL responded; three (18%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 12 (70%) achieved partial remission (PR), 1 (6%) patient had stable disease (SD) and 1 (6%) patient progressed through treatment. Median duration of response for patients with aggressive NHL was 3 months. The response rate in indolent NHL/CLL was 73%. Four (27%) patients achieved CR, 7 (46%) PR and 4 (27%) SD. At two years post treatment, 55% of the patients with indolent NHL/CLL remain progression-free, although 4 patients have proceeded to consolidation therapy. Twenty-seven out of 28 (96%) patients developed neutropenia of short duration following one or more of their treatments. Twenty-three patients developed an infection at some stage during therapy (all associated with neutropenia) and required hospitalisation. There were two toxic deaths (infection) both of which occurred in patients who were neutropenic before starting COP-X. Platelet toxicity was mild in patients with normal platelet counts at the commencement of therapy. Alopecia and mucositis were mild. No clinical evidence of myocardial failure was observed. We conclude that the substitution of DaunoXome for doxorubicin in the CHOP regimen to form COP-X provides excellent efficacy against non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Response durations were short but comparable to those reported with other regimens. COP-X was well tolerated with some suggestion of reduced non-haematological toxicity. The regimen should be considered as an alternative to CHOP with potentially less non-haematological toxicity, particularly cardiac; further studies are required to evaluate the regimen in this context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".