Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy is Superior to Topical Nitroglycerin for Healing Chronic Anal Fissure and does not Compromise Long-Term Fecal Continence: Six-Year Follow-Up of a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although there is enthusiasm for nonoperative management of anal fissures, most trials have been of short duration (6-8 weeks) and long-term outcome is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcome in two cohorts of patients who had participated in a randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of topical nitroglycerin with internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHODS: Between February 1997 and October 1998, 82 patients with chronic anal fissure were accrued and randomized to 0.25 percent nitroglycerin ointment t.i.d. or lateral internal sphincterotomy. In 2004, a telephone survey of trial participants was conducted to determine symptom recurrence, the need for further medical and/or surgical treatment, and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients were assessed for symptoms of fecal incontinence using the Jorge and Wexner Fecal Incontinence Score and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 51 of the original 82 patients (62 percent, 27 nitroglycerin, 24 lateral internal sphincterotomy) completed our survey. Mean follow-up was 79 (+/-1) months. Sphincterotomy patients were less likely to have experienced fissure symptoms within the past year (0 vs. 41 percent; P = 0.0004) and were less likely to require subsequent surgical treatment (0 vs. 59 percent; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with nitroglycerin. Patients in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group were more likely to say that they were "very" or "moderately" satisfied with their treatment (100 vs. 56 percent; P = 0.04) and that they would choose the same treatment again (92 vs. 63 percent; P = 0.02) than patients in the nitroglycerin group. Finally, the fecal incontinence and fecal incontinence quality of life scores at six-year follow-up were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: After six years of follow-up, it seems that lateral internal sphincterotomy is a more durable treatment for chronic anal fissure compared with topical nitroglycerin therapy and does not compromise long-term fecal continence. Thus, sphincterotomy continues to be a good treatment for patients with chronic anal fissure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".