Frost hollows of the boreal forest as extreme environments for black spruce tree growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An extensive survey of spruce growth forms was conducted in frost hollows of the Parc national des Grands-Jardins located in the highlands of the Charlevoix region (Quebec). Frost hollows studied were situated within lichen woodlands, which are a favourable environment for the formation of cold air masses. The mean number of frosts recorded 1 m aboveground during the growing seasons of 1997–2002 indicates that there is no frost-free period in frost hollows. Based on the records of minimum temperature in two frost hollows, the critical threshold for frost-ring formation is a nocturnal temperature below 0 °C for 6.4 h with a climax at around –5.7 °C, i.e., at a cooling rate of 1.78 °C/h under the freezing point for at least 3.2 h. Frequent and severe nocturnal frosts slow down the colonization of black spruce in frost hollows, and are at the origin of the inverted tree line that surrounds frost hollows. Mean stem height of black spruce in frost hollows is 1.97 m ± 2.15. A comparative analysis of aerial photographs between 1950 and 1996 showed a 34% reduction in frost hollow area due to the progressive colonization of black spruce. Massive tree establishment occurred in frost hollows between 1970 and 1980 because of the reduced frequency of freezing temperatures during the growing season.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".