MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988185000 · doi:10.1121/1.428412

Impedance-matched absorbers for finite-difference parabolic equation algorithms

2000· article· en· W1988185000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerfectly matched layerFinite-difference time-domain methodParaxial approximationMathematical analysisSpurious relationshipPropagatorFinite differenceMathematicsElectrical impedanceMaxwell's equationsFinite difference methodTransverse planeBoundary value problemPhysicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a perfectly matched layer (PML) absorber, recently introduced into the electromagnetic propagation literature by Berenger [J. Comput. Phys. 114, 185-200 (1994)], is adapted for use with both paraxial and wide-angle acoustic parabolic equations (PEs). Our procedure incorporates an imaginary component into the transverse coordinate that mimics the introduction of a fictitious absorber on the edge of the computational grid. Use of such an impedance-matched layer can significantly reduce spurious reflections compared to physical absorbing layer methods and thus allows a smaller number of boundary points to be employed in PE calculations. Numerical results obtained with several higher-order propagator approximations confirm that such impedance-matched absorbers efficiently eliminate reflections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it