MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988190433 · doi:10.1002/jemt.10242

Perturbations in paracrine control of the circulation: Role of the endothelial‐derived vasomediators, endothelin‐1 and nitric oxide

2002· review· en· W1988190433 on OpenAlexaff
Imtiaz A. Mawji, Philip A. Marsden

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnosNitric oxideParacrine signallingEndothelin 1Messenger RNACell biologyBiologyEndothelin receptorNitric oxide synthaseNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIIEndotheliumChemistryGeneEndocrinologyBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central to the control of vascular resistance in the systemic and pulmonary circulation and at the solid organ level is the function of the endothelial-derived vasomediators, endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide. Regulation of steady-state levels of ET-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mRNAs represents an early and influential step in their biosynthesis and is highly responsive to exogenous stimuli. ET-1 is expressed from a rapidly inducible promoter to generate a highly labile mRNA. Conversely, the eNOS promoter generates a constitutive level of a very stable mRNA and utilizes posttranscriptional mechanisms to modulate mRNA expression. The response of these genes in models of cellular activation commonly reflects a reciprocal pattern of regulation, namely, transcriptional induction of ET-1 and destabilization of the eNOS mRNA. Elucidating the mechanisms influencing ET-1 and eNOS mRNA is providing novel insight into endothelial gene regulation and providing opportunities for future therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy Research and TechniqueSame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207