Bioinspired Neural Network for Real-Time Cooperative Hunting by Multirobots in Unknown Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple robot cooperation is a challenging and critical issue in robotics. To conduct the cooperative hunting by multirobots in unknown and dynamic environments, the robots not only need to take into account basic problems (such as searching, path planning, and collision avoidance), but also need to cooperate in order to pursue and catch the evaders efficiently. In this paper, a novel approach based on a bioinspired neural network is proposed for the real-time cooperative hunting by multirobots, where the locations of evaders and the environment are unknown and changing. The bioinspired neural network is used for cooperative pursuing by the multirobot team. Some other algorithms are used to enable the robots to catch the evaders efficiently, such as the dynamic alliance and formation construction algorithm. In the proposed approach, the pursuing alliances can dynamically change and the robot motion can be adjusted in real-time to pursue the evader cooperatively, to guarantee that all the evaders can be caught efficiently. The proposed approach can deal with various situations such as when some robots break down, the environment has different boundary shapes, or the obstacles are linked with different shapes. The simulation results show that the proposed approach is capable of guiding the robots to achieve the hunting of multiple evaders in real-time efficiently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".