MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988197195 · doi:10.1137/s0036139902400477

Averaging of Dispersion-Managed Solitons: Existence and Stability

2003· article· en· W1988197195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamiltonian (control theory)Hamiltonian systemNonlinear systemMathematicsGaussianNonlinear Schrödinger equationSolitonDispersion (optics)Stability (learning theory)Mathematical analysisMathematical physicsPhysicsSchrödinger equationQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider existence and stability of dispersion-managed solitons in the two approximations of the periodic nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation: (i) a dynamical system for a Gaussian pulse and (ii) an average integral NLS equation. We apply normal form transformations for finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems with periodic coefficients. First-order corrections to the leading-order averaged Hamiltonian are derived explicitly for both approximations. Bifurcations of soliton solutions and their stabilityare studied by analysis of critical points of the first-order averaged Hamiltonians. The validity of the averaging procedure is verified and the presence of ground states corresponding to dispersion-managed solitons in the averaged Hamiltonian is established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it